Independent affiliate website • Purchases are completed with the named retailer

Open index · version 1.0.0 · 2026-08-11

UK CBD catalogue transparency index

A reproducible measure of how completely brands in the thCBDx catalogue expose the facts needed for comparison. It measures our captured evidence—not whether a product works, is safe, legal or suitable for anyone.

Release table

Brand results

Rankings are recalculated from the dated product dataset. Commission, partner status and catalogue placement have zero weight.

RankBrandScoreBandProductsCBD totalPack sizeFresh pricesReviewed
1Blazzin Flava100/100Leading1100%100%100%100%
2DankTerps100/100Leading1100%100%100%100%
3Marys Hemp Farm100/100Leading1100%100%100%100%
4The Terpene Collection100/100Leading1100%100%100%100%
5Juicy Dutch96/100Leading7100%100%100%85.7%
6Daily Rise95/100Leading3100%100%100%100%
7Ascent95/100Leading1100%100%100%100%
8British Hemp Co.92/100Leading6100%83.3%100%100%
9Nordic Oil90/100Leading38100%94.7%100%68.4%
10Stronglife89/100Leading11100%90.9%100%63.6%
11Orange County CBD88/100Leading89100%84.3%100%58.4%
12Little Rick88/100Leading5100%100%100%20%
13CBD Asylum83/100Strong12100%100%100%0%
14Reakiro UK83/100Strong12100%100%100%0%
15SOOL82/100Strong12100%100%100%0%
16Feel Supreme82/100Strong3100%100%100%0%
17Happy Hemper81/100Strong7100%100%100%0%
18Voyager Life Limited80/100Strong14100%92.9%100%0%
19Improved Health80/100Strong11100%81.8%100%0%
20HEMPE80/100Strong6100%100%100%0%
21Silverback CBD80/100Strong4100%100%100%0%
22Love CBD76/100Strong5100%80%100%0%
23Infinity CBD75/100Strong13100%76.9%100%0%
24SupremeCBD74/100Strong91100%52.7%100%0%

How the score is calculated

Each component is a percentage coverage rate multiplied by its published weight. The weighted values sum to a score out of 100 and are rounded only at the end. Missing facts lower coverage; they are never guessed from another product or brand.

25%

CBD total coverage

Share of sampled products with a readable total-CBD figure.

20%

Current price coverage

Share with a positive, captured catalogue price.

20%

Pack-size coverage

Share with a parseable bottle, weight or pack-size field.

15%

Price-check freshness

Share checked since 1 July 2026 in this first release.

15%

Editorial evidence

Share carrying a full thCBDx editorial review; unreviewed products receive no invented score.

5%

Flavour coverage

A low-weight field because flavour is not relevant to every format.

Published bands

Leading: 85–100 · Strong: 70–84 · Developing: 50–69 · Limited: 0–49. A band describes catalogue transparency within this sample, not product quality.

What this index can answer

  • Which sampled brands expose consistent CBD totals and pack facts?
  • Where are dated comparison fields most complete?
  • Which brands have the greatest independent editorial-review coverage on thCBDx?
  • What changed between future dated releases?

What it cannot answer

  • Whether a product is effective, safe or appropriate.
  • Whether every product complies with UK law.
  • Laboratory quality where an exact batch document has not been verified.
  • Overall UK market share or consumer satisfaction.

Audit trail and corrections

The index is derived from the same versioned records as the public product dataset. Brand names and product facts originate with retailers; thCBDx supplies the selection rules, normalisation and calculations. A brand can request a factual correction without buying placement, and any correction is handled under the same method.

Suggested citation: thCBDx (2026), UK CBD Catalogue Transparency Index, version 1.0.0, snapshot 2026-08-11. Licensed CC BY 4.0 for the original selection, scoring method and calculations.